About Me

Name: Jim Clonts
Email: jimclonts@jimclonts.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Saving America by Destroying It

Saving America by Destroying it

Lately I've noticed a disturbing new trend in Democratic legislation. Whether they are attacking the healthcare, automotive or energy industries, the new laws seem to be based on a single premise: destroy the profitability of the existing companies by creating an economic environment in which they cannot compete.

The stated aim of the Energy/Climate Change bill, also called Cap and Trade, is to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and replace them with "green" alternatives. The legislation, however, does not build "green" alternatives, rather it creates an environment where fossil fuel providers and power generators cannot make a profit. Obama himself said during the campaign his plan would "bankrupt the coal industry" and "cause electrical rates to necessarily skyrocket." His words, not mine.

If the Government proclaimed it was spending two-hundred billion dollars to build a giant solar array in the Arizona desert, or fifty new nuclear power plants, or an experimental geothermal plant, I could almost get behind that. That type of investment would at least yield something tangible. Instead, the legislation does not create new energy systems. It simply destroys the profitability of today's energy producers. The master plan relies on existing energy producers paying higher taxes in the form of carbon credits. This ensures no utility will expand their operations, since their return on investment is guaranteed to be negative. In fact, some oil company executives have already said they would shrink operations, shut down refineries and import more foreign fuels to meet demand. Cap and Trade achieves its goal by driving companies into bankruptcy. This is pure genius---if your goal is to own the energy industry. Once the energy producers' stock prices are driven below sea level due to the mass exodus of investors, it will be all that more easy for the Government to buy them out when they do go under---ala General Motors.

The same is true for the healthcare industry. By creating a non-competitive operating environment where you pit traditional insurance companies against the bottomless well of the US Treasury you guarantee the Government Option will be the only survivor. Then, when everyone is on some form of Medicare and hospitals, clinics and physicians are forced to accept government payment terms, their profitability will collapse and they will declare bankruptcy---all part of the plan for a government that wants to own the healthcare industry as well.

It seems the Master strategy is to drive these industries into the ground by sucking them dry of capital through taxation or regulation, then in the name of the "public good", bail them out and in the process gain an ownership stake and a place in the boardroom. President Obama repeatedly states he does not wish to run these industries. I believe him. His goal is not to run them, but dictate how they are to be run, through his many Czars, making the CEOs who do run them subservient to the will of the Government.

What is the end result of such a strategy? History has many examples of authoritarian governments dictating operating policy to private industries : National Socialist Germany (Messerschmitt, Daimler-Benz, Krupp), Imperial Japan (Mitsubishi) and Venezuela (CITGO) to name a few. In the United States we have some major companies cozying up to the Federal Government in preparation of this new future: General Electric, Goldman-Sachs, General Motors and Chrysler, to name a few. By the way, this is not socialism. The Government does not own the means of production. This economic model is called fascism and President Obama is correct in calling it “fundamentally transforming” the United States of America.

How's that hope and change working for you?

JC

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Free Market is the Result of Our Free Will

The Importance of Free Markets

The Free Market seems to be misunderstood by most Americans. Over and over again I hear the Government and the political pundits say the Markets must be controlled, that left unregulated they lead to economic disparity and unfair outcomes. The greed of the Free Market leads to corruption and exploitation of the working man and woman. Liberals mistrust the Free Market and install through legislation and rule-making ways to limits its activities. Liberal political pundits say the Free Market is risky and has failed us. They lay our current economic woes at the feet of the Free Market. In truth the Free Market hasn't been completely free in decades.

It's easy for politicians to fear the Free Market, whether talking about the stock market, the housing market, commodities market or any other venue where market forces determine the value of things. They fear it because at its root they cannot control it. Politicians love control and make no mistake, control is what they are about. Because they fear the outcomes of a Free Market, Washington has done its best to corrupt its functioning. Politicians want people to look to them for answers, for security and something as vague as the Free Market is portrayed as risky and even anachronistic.

Americans seem to have forgotten that our wants, desires, opinions, fears, ambitions and most all, our choices are the forces which drive the Free Market. It is based on the simplest of concepts: the freedom to live our lives as we choose. We have the freedom to choose what house we buy and how much we’re willing to pay for it, what car we drive and how much we will pay for it, the companies in which we invest and how much we will pay for a good or service. It's that simple. The Free Market is our choices.

The price of a good or service is based on what we will pay for it. Competition is what keeps prices in check. If the price of some product rises due to increased demand, an opportunity is created for a competitor to offer a comparable product at a lower price. This competitor cannot sell an inferior product and expect to make sales. The competitor must produce something comparable for a lower price. This takes hard work, dedication, risk-taking and innovation. If successful they make money and the consumer benefits from the lower prices. It also serves as a wake-up call for the first company to increase their efficiency, or they go out of business. The consumers' choices drive the market. Most people do not realize that the profit, the primary goal of all businesses, is realized most often by producing a superior product or service at prices that benefit the consumer. Exploiting the consumer or providing them with unsatisfactory alternatives is a sure-fire way to bankrupt yourself.

The stock and commodities markets are no different. The price of a stock or commodity is determined by the buyers and the sellers, each operating in their own interests, opposing forces keeping the markets in check. Free choice determines where investment occurs with companies competing to attract investors. Companies strive to increase performance, which leads to sales and profits, allowing them to reward their investors through dividends or increased value of the shares.

Left to its own devices free markets can make short-term mistakes, but they are always self-correcting. If something is overvalued, the true value will eventually become evident and the price will fall. Free Market Capitalism is an economic auto-pilot that will keep an economy on a mostly even keel.

That being said, Government does its best to corrupt free markets, to exert control of the people and limit our freedoms. It does this through tax policy, regulation, price controls, subsidies, interest rates, monetary supply, wage controls, environmental regulations which defy common sense and other freedom-limiting legislation. Government continually makes decisions which limit our freedom, corrupts the natural cycle of supply and demand, disincentivizes competition and reduces choices.

One great example of Government interference is the fossil fuel industry. This country is blessed with an abundance of oil, coal and natural gas. Offshore areas of the US are rich in oil and gas and we’ve recently discovered an oil field in the Dakotas that rivals Saudi Arabia. You wouldn’t know this by where we get our fuel, however. In the name of stopping global warming the Government will not let us drill for these resources. This restricts supply, increases price and exports trillions of dollars a year to Middle Eastern countries not exactly our friends.

Why was there a housing boom for the last ten years? Why were prices rising 20% a year in California, New York and Florida? Why was the demand for new homes so high? Once again the Government interfered in the Market. Through their surrogates Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, they created the sub-prime mortgage market, encouraging banks to make loans to people who would not normally qualify. They would in turn buy the loans from the banks. This generated false demand for homes and caused existing home prices to rise dramatically. When tens of thousands of these risky loans finally went bad, the bubble burst and the Market tried to correct itself, but Government is still fighting it tooth and nail, pouring hundreds of billions into the banking industry and trying to re-inflate the bubble. The equity of those homes are not coming back up anytime soon. They were never real to begin with.

As Americans we have to be wary of Government tampering with our free markets, recognize it for what it is and act in the best interest of the nation at each election. We cannot sit idly by and watch the economic freedoms which have made this country great be slowly destroyed, only to be replaced with a Government-planned economy designed to cement power for a new political ruling-class. Janis Joplin said freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose. We are rapidly approaching that level of “freedom.”
 
JC
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Parable of Sonia Sotomayor and Little League Baseball

 
It was a sunny Saturday afternoon in May when the Tigers held their first practice. The draft looks to be good to us this year, thought the manager. The ten and eleven year old boys were excited to be back on the field, back playing the game they loved. As it was the first practice of the year, the manager introduced himself and his coaches and made each boy say his name and what position they'd like to play. Two of the boys, Michael Townsend and Charley Smith, said they'd like to pitch.
       "Boys, I appreciate your enthusiasm and I'm very glad to have you two on the team, but this year Pablo and Gabriel are going to be our pitchers.  Everyone knows Hispanics make better pitchers than blacks and whites. Michael, basketball season is just around the corner, and, Charley, have you thought about hockey? I'm sure you're fine baseball players, but clearly we have to go with our strengths if we want to win."
 
If you were a parent and overheard this, what would you do? Confront the manager? Complain to the League? Pull your son from the team? If this is unacceptable behavior for a Little League baseball coach, why is it acceptable for a Supreme Court Justice?
 
Jim Clonts
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Unconstitutional?

Friends of Liberty

Our Government believes the Constitution is nothing but a piece of old parchment. For
over 100 years the Courts of the United States have been usurping the Constitution by
simple interpretation. They read the carefully crafted words of the Founders, then
extrapolate meanings never originally intended.

Although Congress and the Executive Branch has been assuming powers far beyond those
outlined in Articles 1 and 2 for decades, the current regime is injecting taxpayer
dollars into private companies, then dictating how they are to do business, and when they
do not succeed, taking an ownership stake, putting themselves in competition with other
private companies. Bankruptcy proceedings are being corrupted by the Federal Government,
with secured bond-holders?  investments being redistributed to the UAW, violating their
property rights guaranteed under the 5th Amendment.  Is any of this Constitutional? What
grants this level of power? Nothing grants it, but nothing prevents it, either.

The Constitution enumerates the powers of the President and Congress. Today our leaders
interpret that as "we can do anything not specifically forbidden." President Obama stated
in an interview when he was a state senator in Illinois  he feels "constrained" by the
Constitution and that the document is a list of "negative" rights, stating what the
Government cannot do to its citizens rather than what is should be able to do.  In the
same interview he said he said the Court have fallen short in the re-distribution of
wealth. His recent Supreme Court nominee has stated "the Appeals Court is where policy is
made", a view that runs contrary to Article III of the Constitution. If our leaders don't
respect  and adhere to the Constitution, what good is it?

Laws are passed and executive orders issued every day that violate the Constitution or
exceed Constitutional mandates. How is this possible? If the law or order is not
challenged in the Courts---it just goes into effect and continues. If something seems
like a good or popular idea, but is blatantly unconstitutional, it may never be
challenged. Quite often politicians are too apt to accept popular sentiment rather than
challenge a patently unconstitutional ruling. The Courts adjudicate what is brought
before them and in some cases, if the topic is too controversial, the Supreme Court may
decide to keep a particular case off their docket.

I worry that stapled to the back of the Constitution our leaders routinely ignore is the
Bill of Rights. How long will it be before they ignore that, too? It will be easy once
they get enough Justices who rule by empathy and social justice rather than our First
Principles.
In truth...this is already  happening.


JC


Agree...disagree...sound off!


Quote of the Week

"There is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later
turn into a judicial one."

Alexis de Tocqueville
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »